Comments on: There’s Enforcement, and Then There’s Enforcement http://www.chinahearsay.com/theres-enforcement-and-then-theres-enforcement/ China law, business and economics commentary Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:49:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Stan http://www.chinahearsay.com/theres-enforcement-and-then-theres-enforcement/comment-page-1/#comment-29517 Stan Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:18:22 +0000 http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=508#comment-29517 Way ahead of me, as usual . . . OK, so the answer is low damages. Don't get me started on that topic or we'll be here all day. Suffice it to say that a litigation "victory" does not end with the judge saying that yes, the other guy is an infringer. This is meaningless unless he is forced to stop and, possibly, you get reasonable damages. Way ahead of me, as usual . . .

OK, so the answer is low damages. Don’t get me started on that topic or we’ll be here all day. Suffice it to say that a litigation “victory” does not end with the judge saying that yes, the other guy is an infringer. This is meaningless unless he is forced to stop and, possibly, you get reasonable damages.

]]> By: IP Dragon http://www.chinahearsay.com/theres-enforcement-and-then-theres-enforcement/comment-page-1/#comment-29490 IP Dragon Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:03:30 +0000 http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=508#comment-29490 Dear Stan, I asked myself the same question, so I emailed Mr Mike Marks. Check out his reply here: http://ipdragon.blogspot.com/2008/03/worktools-we-won-judgement-but-it-did.html. Cheers, IP Dragon ????? Gathering, commenting on and sharing information about intellectual property in China to make it more transparent, since 2005 Dear Stan,

I asked myself the same question, so I emailed Mr Mike Marks. Check out his reply here: http://ipdragon.blogspot.com/2008/03/worktools-we-won-judgement-but-it-did.html.

Cheers,

IP Dragon ?????
Gathering, commenting on and sharing information about intellectual property in China to make it more transparent, since 2005

]]>