Apologies for a long, cranky post during the holidays, but this topic deserves some attention. As you know, I’ve been writing about trademark squatting and other registration issues for a long time, and the subject has been particularly hot in the past couple of years with disputes involving famous brands and names like iPad, Hermes, [...]
Looks like we can finally put this whole thing to bed: According to China Trademark Office’s latest ” Announcement of Trademarks “, the iPad trademark, which used to owned by Shenzhen Proview were formally transferred to Apple on July 27, 2012. And by Chinese Trademark Law, Apple could exercise the exclusive right over the trademark [...]
Proview stiffed its lawyers, and that’s probably all the analysis that is necessary here.
Proview is now being sued by its PRC trademark counsel for lack of payment. Funny how often that happens when your client is insolvent.
Eh, nothing to worry about. If it doesn’t come with a pair of glasses or 3D, the kids aren’t interested anymore.
The long, strange journey is at an end. All things considered, I think Apple is probably quite satisfied with this number.
Just for the record: A court in South China’s Guangdong Province will open a trial tomorrow in a case filed by Fubon Insurance asking the court to begin bankruptcy proceedings against Proview Technology Shenzhen Co, a move that might disrupt Proview’s ongoing litigation with Apple Inc over the ownership of the iPad trademark. Fubon Insurance, [...]
Yet another non-news news event. It’ll be over when it’s over, folks. The court has the discretion to wait.
This one never really had the chance to go anywhere and was knocked out in the first round. Poor little lawsuit.
Just in case you read about this in either Xinhua, Global Times or China Daily, please do not think that anything has actually happened in the iPad trademark dispute, or at least anything that can be verified. Here’s what was reported: Pragmatic progress has been made in the dispute between Proview Technology (Shenzhen) and Apple [...]
Nothing has happened this week with the iPad case, but the media seems to think that Apple has already lost.
Not a big surprise with the contract dispute against Apple pending in Guangdong’s High Court, so this is just FYI: A Chinese court on Saturday blocked a request to liquidate the financially ailing Proview Technology (Shenzhen), a decision that leaves doors open for the company to continue its lawsuit against Apple Inc. over the use [...]
Oh, to be a fly on the wall during that meeting. But since we weren’t there, we can always waste time with groundless speculation.
“Let’s not bicker and argue about who killed who.” The Holy Grail or the iPad trademark dispute? Hard to tell, really. The AP has the latest on the out-of-court verbal jousting: In its latest statement on a simmering dispute over the iPad brand name, Apple Inc. said Tuesday that Proview Electronics’ insistence that it still [...]
While we’re all waiting for the court to act, the Proview team has continued with the harsh language. The iPad 3 launch must be making them crazy.
Relax, this will be a quickie. We already know what’s at stake in terms of Apple continuing to sell iPad-branded tablets in China. Another issue that hasn’t been discussed much in this whole conversation about the Proview-Apple dispute is enforcement of the iPad mark against third parties. Michael Kan wrote about that topic in PC [...]
Followers of the iPad dispute (and China Hearsay) may wish to check out this Bloomberg interview I did yesterday.
That was quick. My original guess was that the court in this case would just sit on a decision and wait. Instead, but to my mind equivalent in the short term, the court said it would not rule in favor of Proview’s request to stop iPad sales. OK, the headlines today said that Apple “won” [...]
A lot of nothing went on in Shanghai today. Let’s see how many words I can generate about a non-news event.
Things appear to be moving ahead rapidly, but let’s not get sidetracked by minor skirmishes.