BBC: China official perks ‘fall by $9bn’ bbc.in/1y9CUcR — good thing I diversified my portfolio out of baijiu & hooker futures
Why China Will Go All-In on Nuclear Power | The Diplomat bit.ly/1rihNw8 — good news for the export control lawyers
A new study has cast doubt on the current enthusiasm in the west for copying teaching methods in China and South Korea, where children score highly in international tests, suggesting that cultural factors beyond school also play a part in their success.
No shit. So you can’t just force a kid to study three hours a day longer and expect her to become a genius? Imagine that.
I grow weary of politicians and administrators who look for the quick fix for societies’ ills. Anyone who has read Crouching Tiger Mom, Bipolar Child, or whatever the title of Amy Chua’s book was (it’s been a few years) and thinks that “hard work” is all that’s needed to fix education is a simplistic idiot.
To Stamp Out Pollution and Corruption, China Could Start With Legal Reform | Stanley Lubman on.wsj.com/1EwVehH — can’t argue with that
Will there be a China–US deal on climate change? | East Asia Forum bit.ly/1pT4VgJ — agree that self interest is the key here
China’s Inscrutable Contraction | Ken Rogoff bit.ly/1vU8Du6 — I like any China article that has “inscrutable” in the headline
Why? Two reasons: 1) anything that is misleading or incorrect should be fixed; and 2) it pisses me off that my colleagues in other countries think I am getting seven additional days of vacation.
Look, I’m no workaholic, and I do not compete with my fellow workers on who can go the longest without sleep or fewest days off in a year, or who has had the most heart attacks or divorces. If you do that sort of thing, screw you, it’s unhealthy — you’re gonna die young and alone, and the rest of us will be laughing at you during your funeral. How’s that for judgmental?
Anyway, we are coming up on China’s National Day holiday, one of two “Golden Week” celebrations. But is it really a week-long holiday? It certainly seems that way if you read anything about it in the news, and even the HR Department where I work, Yahweh bless ‘em, will no doubt put out an email to the whole of Asia telling everyone that China staff will be enjoying a 7-day holiday.
But it’s all a lie. The truth is that the 7-day holiday is a hoax. First, two of the days fall on the weekend, days we would have got off work anyway. So already we’re down to a 5-day holiday. But wait a minute, it gets better. Second, we have two “make-up” days.
This is like when you were in school and the teacher had to skip a lecture because she had to travel to Scranton at the last minute because her sister was having an emergency crotch operation. No class that day, but it was rescheduled, ’cause that lecture on gender identity conflicts in post-Lovecraftian American horror was key to the entire semester. Damn, I miss school.
Right, where was I? Oh yeah, make-up days. For the National Day holiday, we have two: September 28 (a Sunday), and October 11 (a Saturday), two days that should be restful, weekend days off work, but are now rather boring make-up sessions. So that 5-day holiday is now three.
Three days off. That’s what this really is. Now, I’m not complaining or anything – I appreciate the time off. I’m just sick and tired of my wiseass colleagues in other countries saying “I’m so jealous. I wish I had so much time off.” This coming from folks who routinely take 4-6 weeks off every summer, basking in their European/Europeanish mandatory time off. Not fair, not fair at all.
Enjoy the holiday, everyone.
Baker & McKenzie: New Compliance and Disclosure Requirements for Your China Subsidiaries bit.ly/1wTohqF – summary of 2014 changes
A Look at Just How Much China’s Housing Downturn Could Hurt GDP – China Real Time Report – WSJ on.wsj.com/ZmpAUf
USCBC 2014 China Business Environment Survey Results | US China Business Council bit.ly/1nCHBbF
China Wants to Know Why Foreigners Are Fleeing Beijing | WSJ on.wsj.com/1rEkeOM — sounds like a waste of time
A looser grip for Beijing’s heavy hand | FT on.ft.com/1vqeuIy — Nick Lardy on China’s private sector
The rise of China and the future of US manufacturing | vox bit.ly/ZjKN12 — focus is on trade effects not policy responses
Wang Xiaoye, one of China’s leading experts on competition law, says foreign companies that feel wrongly accused of antitrust behavior need to take their cases to Chinese courts.
Most so far have been prepared to accept fines from the authorities, rather than to appeal their cases in the courts, and some have expressed fears privately that they will not get a fair hearing.
Sounds reasonable. If you have a strong case, why not go to court?
Yes, well, a couple of things. First, would there be any hope of success challenging a decision of a Chinese government regulator? Probably not, although the general idea is not as crazy as it might sound. Administrative decisions are appealed all the time these days, including many I’ve seen personally from the trademark and patent office. While those cases are not exactly comparable to the more politically-sensitive decisions made under the Anti-monopoly Law, at least there is a general precedent.
Second, what would be the scope of the challenge? This is where I part company with the suggestion. These “aggrieved” companies are not, for the most part, complaining about the specifics. From what I’ve read about quite a few regulatory decisions, the bitching and whining has focused more on selective enforcement than on the merits of particular cases.
Therefore, even if there was a chance of winning in court, what would they be challenging? A claim that the regulators may have gotten the analysis right but was unfair in its selection of targets is not, I would suppose, a winning litigation strategy.
Newly armed police in China | Washington Post wapo.st/ZjIQlm — I worry about the long-term effects of this policy
Alibaba Approved To Establish Its Own Bank | China Money Pod bit.ly/1voNF6B — makes sense, I guess
China’s Real Corruption Challenge: Swatting Thousands of ‘Flies’ | The Diplomat bit.ly/1vpv9fk
The obvious answer is that the measles vaccines are simply not effective.
I will no doubt get some comments on this post reminding me to stop wasting my time on stupid crap from fringe blogs. Fair enough. Then again, the motivation for 97% of all blog posts is the classic “Someone made an incorrect statement or said something that pissed me off, and I wanted to respond or debunk.” This is one of those occasions.
The blog in question is “Wake Up World,” and while I’m not a regular reader, just the title alone (and the post in question) suggests to me that this is either wacky, nutjob conspiracy stuff or surprising evidence that folks with anencephaly can write blogs. Continue reading
Decade-long QQ trademark dispute receives final verdict | China Daily bit.ly/1mCctsa — well-known mark status not extended to cars