<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China&#8217;s Newest Tainted Dairy Export: Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinahearsay.com/chinas-newest-tainted-dairy-export-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinahearsay.com/chinas-newest-tainted-dairy-export-litigation/</link>
	<description>China law, business and economics commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.chinahearsay.com/chinas-newest-tainted-dairy-export-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-57090</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=933#comment-57090</guid>
		<description>I looked at Dan&#039;s posting and I agree with him.  My personal feeling is that its a weak case.  I don&#039;t know for sure b/c I dont know how the facts are being cast, but I can say that plaintiffs will have a really tough time even getting this heard outside of something significant happening here in the U.S. that caused the harm.  (Unless the complaint has a lot of stuff that we didn&#039;t expect...  but I find that doubtful)

I worked on some litigation that involved some chemical products and ended up that plaintiffs in South America chased my client in America.  I left that firm before the case reached a resolution, but if I recall correctly after reading it in the papers, that case went away b/c there just wasn&#039;t anything in there that justified an American court hearing the case. 

I can&#039;t offer an expert opinion on this, but having worked at a very reputable plaintiff&#039;s class action firm for a short stint (not the same firm mentioned above, I moved to the defense side), I would bet that the lawyers there would find this case pretty unlikely to move beyond anything substantial as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at Dan&#8217;s posting and I agree with him.  My personal feeling is that its a weak case.  I don&#8217;t know for sure b/c I dont know how the facts are being cast, but I can say that plaintiffs will have a really tough time even getting this heard outside of something significant happening here in the U.S. that caused the harm.  (Unless the complaint has a lot of stuff that we didn&#8217;t expect&#8230;  but I find that doubtful)</p>
<p>I worked on some litigation that involved some chemical products and ended up that plaintiffs in South America chased my client in America.  I left that firm before the case reached a resolution, but if I recall correctly after reading it in the papers, that case went away b/c there just wasn&#8217;t anything in there that justified an American court hearing the case. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t offer an expert opinion on this, but having worked at a very reputable plaintiff&#8217;s class action firm for a short stint (not the same firm mentioned above, I moved to the defense side), I would bet that the lawyers there would find this case pretty unlikely to move beyond anything substantial as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.chinahearsay.com/chinas-newest-tainted-dairy-export-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-56950</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=933#comment-56950</guid>
		<description>There might be some jurisdictional problems bringing suit in the 4th Circuit. The Eastern District of Louisiana has gone the farthest in upsetting forum non conveniens claims. Martinez v Dow Chemical, 219 F.Supp.2d 719. But, in that case the defendants were US companies. Still, it is a pretty snazzy idea, and I can&#039;t wait to hear more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might be some jurisdictional problems bringing suit in the 4th Circuit. The Eastern District of Louisiana has gone the farthest in upsetting forum non conveniens claims. Martinez v Dow Chemical, 219 F.Supp.2d 719. But, in that case the defendants were US companies. Still, it is a pretty snazzy idea, and I can&#8217;t wait to hear more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.chinahearsay.com/chinas-newest-tainted-dairy-export-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-56884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=933#comment-56884</guid>
		<description>Weird.  Very weird.  Much of this story just doesn&#039;t make sense.  Rather than write a full page comment or try to be concise, I just went ahead and did a full post on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird.  Very weird.  Much of this story just doesn&#8217;t make sense.  Rather than write a full page comment or try to be concise, I just went ahead and did a full post on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinamatt</title>
		<link>http://www.chinahearsay.com/chinas-newest-tainted-dairy-export-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-56881</link>
		<dc:creator>chinamatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinahearsay.com/?p=933#comment-56881</guid>
		<description>I suppose if the government won&#039;t allow them to sue the Chinese company, their only option would be to attempt to sue a company in the US. The lawyer probably knows he&#039;ll lose the case, but will get paid anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose if the government won&#8217;t allow them to sue the Chinese company, their only option would be to attempt to sue a company in the US. The lawyer probably knows he&#8217;ll lose the case, but will get paid anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/14 queries in 0.051 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: www.chinahearsay.com @ 2012-02-09 14:16:15 -->
